Supreme Court rules for equal civil partnerships

Heterosexual equality at last! Discrimination ends

0

“This is a victory for love and equality. It was never right to deny opposite-sex couples the option of having a civil partnership. In a democracy, we are all supposed to be equal before the law. It is wonderful news that the Supreme Court has ruled against the government and in favour of equal civil partnerships,” said Peter Tatchell, LGBT and human rights campaigner and Director of the Peter Tatchell Foundation.

He has supported Rebecca Steinfeld’s and Charles Keidan from the outset of their legal challenge in 2014.

Indeed, he championed the right of opposite-sex couples to have a civil partnership from the moment Tony Blair’s government announced in 2003 that the option would be available to same-sex couples only, condemning it as “blatant discrimination based on sexual orientation.”

Speaking about today’s victory in the Supreme Court, Mr Tatchell said:

“The ban on opposite-sex civil partnerships was discrimination and a violation of human rights. It is outrageous that the government was unwilling to legislate equality and that this couple were forced to go to court to get a basic human right – the right to be treated equally in law.

“It was never fair that same-sex couples had two options, civil partnerships and civil marriages, whereas opposite-sex partners had only one option, marriage,” said Mr Tatchell.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here